I read a blog post by Andrew Wicklander about the reason why a $41 Million investment in Color was a bad idea. In his post Andrew says:
“But I think there’s something much more ominous than a poor version 1.0 and being made fun of that their investors should be worried about. And that is that the founding team, regardless of their previous successes (which are large), are showing a general lack of creativity and a misunderstanding of the marketplace in which we currently live.
This is evident most clearly in the fact that they paid $350,000 for the domain name color.com and another $150,000 for the domain name colour.com. That’s right, half a million dollars for two domain names.
The problem with this isn’t necessarily the cost of the domains, but the fact that they even think domain names matter anymore. I was talking with a friend and he made a great point that if someone was selling diapers, and it was 1997, and they bought diapers.com it might actually make sense.
I do find the cost of the domains ridiculous, and I also disagree with Andrew that domain names do not matter anymore. While it might not have the same impact as in 1997, choosing a company name (and an accompanying domain name) can have a surprising effect.”
In 2010 I founded a new company that built a platform aimed at mobile app developers and publishers.
We spent a lot of time on the technical details, developer and user experience. The platform connects your app to all major social networks and enables sharing of content for your users to their friends. The platform also offers comprehensive real-time Social Analytics for the app developer/publisher allowing them to improve the user experience. We built native frameworks for both iOS and Android allowing developers to integrate the service literally in five minutes.
While building the technology we didn’t spent (nearly enough) time on a name for the company. At some point we decided we understood the basics concept and reached a point where the question of a name for the company/service needed to be answered. We did the usual brainstorming, mind mapping, finding inspiration elsewhere, but couldn’t get to a name we felt comfortable with.
One day I decided we should just pick something. Not having a name was blocking our release schedule (we needed a web site!). We already knew we would do iOS development (Android was on our radar too), so a lot of associations we made were somehow related to Apple.
We ended up combining a color with an apple, pink and Elstar (the Elstar is a famous Dutch apple).


The star was interesting as it would fit perfectly in certain aspects of our service and made a good icon. It sounded ok, although we did worry if English speaking customers would know how to spell it (PinkelStar, PinkleStar?). We grabbed the domain and had ourselves a name.
In the fall of 2010 we had our first public appearance. We got featured on VentureBeat, drew more attention to our site and got other sites to publish about our new service. We landed a $500K funding round and were building on the service. We got developers to test the service and provide us valuable feedback. The first apps were finding their way into the different marketplaces with PinkelStar integrated.
And then it all happened. After a TechCrunch post someone made an smart remark about our company name. Were we aware that ‘pinkeln’ actually means ‘to pee’ in German, and that we effectively managed to call our company ‘Peeing star’? WTF?
Our company is based in Amsterdam, Germany is our neighboring country. But none of us realized what PinkelStar translated to in German. We were hoping that developers would pick up on the benefits of our service. Instead that one comment lead to an entire new discussion.
The comment got picked up by ‘a few’ German Twitter users, and a ‘peeing’ storm was born. Hundreds of retweets appeared and traffic to our main website surged to a level twenty times higher than usual.

Within hours it seemed everyone in Germany knew that we were the new peeing stars of Europe.
It was one of those moments where you wish you could hide on a deserted island with no one to bother you. It is said that all publicity is good publicity, but this is not what we intended nor wanted when we combined a color and a fruit to pick a company name.
The name got us a lot of unexpected attention. Did it hurt us in the end? I don’t think so. We did have a few very awkward investor meetings afterwards. And for obvious reasons that traffic spike didn’t lead to new signups. I am still awaiting the first German app to integrate our service :-)
We have decided to change the name. In the end we felt it is important enough to choose a name that makes us, our users, and our customers happy.
What will our new name be then? Glad you ask. This is yet another story to be told but for now it suffices to mention that we are about to launch a new consumer app that, we believe, will change the way you can discover great mobile apps.
We have put more effort into finding a good name for the consumer service and ended up with Zwapp. The consumer app and the developer’s platform all fit into one unifying company strategy, so I felt it was important to align the service names. PinkelStar will therefore be renamed to Zwapp Connect.
Color may have spent too much on 2 domain names, but making a mistake like ours as a startup is costly too. Not just in terms of money (which should be spent wisely), but also in terms of design and development costs. Rebranding your service can be a costly exercise.
We will launch the new website shortly, and with that public launch the service will come out of Beta. Until that time you can sign up for the service here.















Comments